🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that began as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are compensated to address predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The surge has peaked, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in winter, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is observed is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a valuable example in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the current time in which it takes place this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a elected representative feels empowered to state that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, far-right parties are growing in Europe as a complete entity.

In the America, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A effort to remove Black history and narrative from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the celebration illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is detached from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month turns into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and heritage of activism for racial justice – community-based BLM initiatives, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – represent an infrastructure that a lot of work has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not avoid political issues, and provides room for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to “microaggressions”, but faced with the threats that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.