🔗 Share this article

A confidential source has disclosed the Afghan leak inquiry that the UK failed to secure sensitive technology allowing Afghanistan's rulers to locate local individuals that had served with western forces.

Data Breach Puts Thousands at Risk

Person A, identified as Person A, stated that Afghans affected by the data leak were advised to change residences and change their contact details to ensure their safety from the Taliban.

Lawmakers are currently examining the Conservative government's management of a serious disclosure of personal details affecting almost nineteen thousand Afghans who had asked to move to the United Kingdom to avoid the Taliban.

How the Leak Was Discovered

A spreadsheet containing private information, comprising names, addresses and occasionally relative details, was inadvertently disclosed by an official stationed at special operations center in February 2022.

The breach became known months later, when the names of multiple applicants who had requested to move to the UK were posted on online platforms.

Militant Technology

It appears there is a false assumption that the Taliban are without similar capabilities that allied forces use,” she told MPs.

All equipment was abandoned in Afghanistan; it's in their hands. Once they acquire your phone number, they can trace you down to within metres. That's precisely what the unit achieved.”

During testimony about regarding if authorities had access to advanced decryption, the whistleblower declared: “They possess all resources.”

Consequences of the Information Leak

Initial findings presented to the inquiry estimated that no fewer than forty-nine family members and co-workers of individuals impacted by the leak had been murdered.

A superinjunction regarding the leak was put in force in late 2023 and restricted all details about it from public disclosure until mid-2025.

Protective Actions

Given injunction limitations, Person A and the non-governmental organization she was working with told individuals at risk they were assisting that they had “concerns that mobile communications had been intercepted”.

“We advised that they relocate if they could and switched their phone numbers. Those were the primary information that, should militant forces acquired this information, would lead to them being traced,” Person A explained.

Challenged Assessments

Person A argued that government assessment performed by a retired civil servant had been incorrect to determine that the obtaining of the information by the regime was “minimally impact present danger”.

“The important fact is that these individuals are in hiding from militant forces; they are in hiding. All concerns relate to former occupations.”

Person A described terrible abuse endured by concerned people, comprising electric shock torture, simulated drowning, and physical abuse.

“Instances include young kids who have had bones crushed to pressure relatives to reveal locations,” Person A stated.